- An Analytical Essay -
There are several
systems currently used in journal writing to document sources. Within the social sciences, APA (American
Psychological Association, 2010) style is frequently used by journal
publishers. The purpose of this paper is
to analyze the techniques for crediting sources in the journal article Providing Increased Access to English L2
Students of Computer Science at a South African University (Dalvit, Murray,
Terzoli, Zhao & Mini, 2005). The specific mechanisms of in-text citations,
signal phrases and referencing are subjected to examination in the light of the
conventions of the Publication Manual of
the American Psychological Association (2010) in its 6th
edition.
With regard to the use
of in-text citations, APA (2010) style requires writers to include the author’s
last name, the year of publication of the source and location reference. In their article, Dalvit et al. (2005) resort
to paraphrasing source material in all cases and they follow the indications of
the APA (2010) system. In other cases,
paraphrased in-text citations are provided in parenthetical format, as in ¨This
allows them to integrate new knowledge about computers into their existing
knowledge structures (Sweetnam-Evans, 2001)¨ (Dalvit et al., 2005, p.74). In some instances, they choose to quote by
means of a signal phrase. Signal phrases
are used to integrate the ideas of others for support of the writers’ own
voice. An example of this in the article
is: ¨According to Heugh (2002),…¨ (Dalvit et al., 2005, p.72).
In relation to the use of signal
phrases, many expressions can be found in the work of Dalvit et al. (2005), as
could be seen in the following examples: ¨Preliminary investigation shows that…¨(p.73),
¨According to Halliday and Martin
(1993),…¨(p.73), ¨interviews with lecturers, tutors and students suggest
that…¨(p.73), and ¨Research has shown that…¨(p.72). Even though the choice of signal phrases
given in the article can be considered apposite in terms of the way in which
they characterize the context of the ideas being borrowed, it should be noted
that they are all stated in present tenses.
This seems to be a deviation from the APA (2010) standards, which
encourage the use of past tenses ¨when discussing another researcher’s work and
when reporting your results¨(p. 78).
As far as referencing is concerned, the
list appears to be in accord with APA (2010) style: the entries are arranged in alphabetical
order and the order of components within each entry coincides with the
requirements in the sixth edition. In
spite of this, there are some elements which do not conform to said
standards. An example of this could be
the numbering in the reference list.
Another detour is the capitalization of all words in the titles of works
when the APA Manual (2010) indicates that writers should ¨capitalize only the
first word of the title¨ (p. 185).
Having analysed the writing style
portrayed in the article by Dalvit et al. (2005), it is possible to conclude
that even though the authors have adhered to the indications of the APA (2010)
style, a close examination seems to reveal some inconsistencies with the
current APA edition.
References
American Psychological
Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological
Association. (6th ed.). Washington , DC :
Author.
Dalvit, L., Mini, B., Murray,
S., Terzoli, A. and Zhao, X. (2005). Providing increased access to
English L2 students of computer science
at a South African University. US-China Education Review, Sep.
2005, Vol. 2 (9)

A Journal Article under Style Scrutiny
por Paula Gabriela Ferrari se encuentra bajo una
Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional.
por Paula Gabriela Ferrari se encuentra bajo una
Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional.
Comments
Post a Comment