By Paula Gabriela Ferrari

Genre-based Analysis of a Research Article Introduction by Paula Gabriela Ferrari is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><img alt="Licencia de Creative Commons" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br /><span xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" href="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text" property="dct:title" rel="dct:type">Genre-based Analysis of a Research Article Introduction</span> by <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" href="http://seedsofacademicwriting.blogspot.com.ar/" property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL">Paula Gabriela Ferrari</a> is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License</a>.
Genre-based Analysis of a
Research Article Introduction
In the fast-paced world of
modern technology and science, the research world has expanded and thus
academic publishing has become a major concern for most academicians. A possible reason for this is related to the
researchers’ need to position themselves in their disciplinary communities by
reaching publication before others (Hyland,2004,p.85). Consequently, scholarly writing has grown to
such an extent that more and more ¨non-Anglophones¨ (Swales, 2004) produce
Research Articles (RAs) alongside native-speaker academicians. According to Swales and Feak (2004), the
Introduction Section (IS) of the RA genre is of outmost importance as it is the
section where researchers highlight the centrality of their own research in the
competition for both recognition among their peers and funding of their work
(p.243). Although considerable research
has been devoted to the analysis of ISs in different fields, more studies of
this central section of the RA are still needed. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the
IS of a RA in the field of education by Maroko (2013).
According to
Swales (1990) and Swales and Feak (2004), most RAs follow a
¨Create-A-Research-Space (CARS) model¨, by which three moves are vital so that
academicians can position themselves in their communities. Regarding the first move (establishing a
territory), Maroko (2013) devotes the first sentence to claim the centrality of
his study by stating that ¨Writing is an integral activity…¨(p.48). After that, the author begins the literature
review, which is the second step when performing move 1. It should be noted that Maroko (2013)
finishes the first paragraph reviewing the literature and immediately after
this, he begins a new section under the heading Literature Review (p.48), where many relevant studies are
cited. At the end of the fourth
paragraph, however, a rhetorical question is included with the aim of creating
a gap while seeking the readers’ engagement (Hyland, 2011,p.202) when it is
said that ¨But are such choices possible…?¨(Maroko, 2013, p.49). After this, Maroko stresses the gap in the
first sentence of the next paragraph by saying: ¨Apparently, writer stance…remains
a poorly understood field.¨(p.49).
Particularly interesting is the fact that the author goes back to the
literature review in that paragraph before finally performing move 3 (occupying
the niche) by introducing a purposive statement. To finish this move, Maroko lists the
research questions which guided his study.
The main purpose
of this paper has been to examine the IS of a RA in the light of Swales (1990)
and Swales and Feak’s (2004) moves analysis. Although the first unlabeled
paragraph in Maroko’s (2013) IS does not include the three moves, those moves
are in fact performed in the next section (Literature
Review). It is noteworthy that, even though this paper has concentrated on
the analysis of a single IS, it does offer some insight into the relevance of
following Swales’ (1990) model for writing successful ISs. This model seems to be particularly helpful
to narrow the gap between ¨senior¨ and ¨junior academics¨ (Swales, 2004) as it
is precisely these three moves the ones that make it possible for researchers
to attain academic positioning in their respective discourse communities.
References
Hyland, K.
(2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic
writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K.
(2011). Disciplines and discourses: Social interactions in the construction of
knowledge. In D. Starke-Meyerring, A. Paré, N. Artemeva, M. Horne, & L.
Yousoubova (Eds.), Writing in the
knowledge society (pp.193-214). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press and The
WAC Clearinghouse.
Maroko, G. M.
(2013). Learning about author positioning in written academic discourse. Argentinian
Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2). Retrieved from
http://www.faapi.org.ar/ajal/issues/102/Maroko.html
http://www.faapi.org.ar/ajal/issues/102/Maroko.html
Swales, J.M.
(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research
settings. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series). Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M.
(2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. (Cambridge
Applied Linguistics Series). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M.
& Feak, C. B. (2004) Academic writing for graduate students:
Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.) Ann Arbor, MI: University of
Michigan Press

Genre-based Analysis of a Research Article Introduction by Paula Gabriela Ferrari is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
Comments
Post a Comment